Mentor Approval Position Statement

This position statement sets out the criteria the Medical Radiation Practice Council of NSW applies when considering approval of a mentor and the Council’s expectations of an approved mentor. It should be read in conjunction with the Council’s Compliance Policy - Mentor, which sets out the obligations of a practitioner subject to mentor conditions.

Mentor conditions are intended to facilitate the development of a relationship between the practitioner and a respected experienced practitioner in the same/similar area of practice, who acts as a support person for the practitioner. A mentor may provide assistance with professional and personal development, and help a practitioner to cope in the professional environment in which he/she may have had some difficulties, or from which he/she may have been absent for some time.

The Council expects a practitioner subject to mentor conditions to ensure that his/her practice (or specified aspects of their practice) is guided by a mentor approved by the Council.

By consenting to act as a Council-approved mentor, a mentor agrees to act as a support person for the practitioner, assisting with their professional and personal development. Mentors are expected to have regular communications with the practitioner, such as telephone conversations and/or face-to-face meetings and to be generally available to discuss issues relating to clinical practice or any other matters that may arise.

The role of the mentor is to be distinguished from that of a supervisor (refer to the Council’s Supervisor Approval Position Statement).

Owing to the supportive nature of a mentoring relationship, the Council will not usually intervene. The mentor should however inform the Council immediately if he/she has any concerns about the practitioner, the mentoring relationship, or if he/she is unable to continue in the role.

As part of their briefing, mentors will receive publicly available information that is relevant to the practitioner being mentored.

Other information may be provided, depending on the constraints of confidentiality in each particular case.

Effective mentoring usually depends upon the creation of a trusting relationship with open and honest communication between the practitioner and the mentor.

Guidance and support can be incorporated into a mentoring relationship in many ways, including:

• Discussion of the personal and professional impact on the practitioner of the issues which brought him/her to the attention of the Council.

• Discussion of work related problems and solutions.

• The opportunity to discuss issues with an objective colleague.

• Discussion about participation by the practitioner in continuing professional education and professional groups and activities.

The following criteria be taken into account when considering whether to approve a mentor:

1. A mentor should be an experienced medical radiation practitioner in a relevant area of practice.
2. A mentor:

a) Should be a registered medical radiation practitioner and be in active clinical practice.

b) Should not be the subject of current investigation, assessment, inquiry or proceedings in relation to conduct, health or performance matters.

c) Should not have conditions imposed on his/her registration.

d) Should not have been the subject of an adverse finding in previous disciplinary proceedings, regardless of whether or not his/her registration remains subject to conditions.

1. The mentor should not be involved (in a material way) in the subject matter which gave rise to the imposition of mentor conditions.
2. Mentors must consent to undertaking the role of mentor.
3. The mentor must indicate that they are prepared to provide feedback to the Council, in a prescribed format (template provided by the Council) and at the frequency prescribed by the mentoring condition.
4. A mentor must be prepared to notify the Council of any immediate concerns in relation to the practitioner’s compliance with the mentorship requirement, or in relation to the practitioner’s conduct, performance or health, or if the mentorship ceases.
5. The relationship between the mentor and the practitioner should be at a purely professional level:

a) A mentor must not be a relative, partner or close friend of the mentored practitioner.

b) A mentor must not be the practitioner’s Council-approved supervisor.

c) Consideration should be given to relationships that might impact on the mentor’s ability to mentor the practitioner. Examples of such circumstances may include:

• Relationships where there is a close social interaction;

• Treating relationship;

• Power imbalance within the relationship;

• Financial/business relationship; and

• Employment relationship.

Nominees who do not meet these criteria may not be approved.

The Council may withdraw a mentor’s approval where a mentor ceases to meet the criteria set out above, or at any time at its discretion.

This Position Statement will be published on the Council’s website, provided to practitioners when mentor conditions are imposed, and provided to nominee mentors. It should be read in conjunction with the Council’s Compliance Policy - Mentor.

• Nominated Mentor Consent Formopen_in_new